Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen 7 5800H
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 2 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800H is 2 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
a50f00
Core
Ice Lake-U
Cezanne
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
426.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
20.37k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
22.52k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
10.18k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
21.49k (x1.52)
TOTAL
74.82k
74.56k (x1)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
144.01k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
191.86k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
84.53k (x2.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
6.5k (x0.74)
TOTAL
214.34k
426.9k (x1.99)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
9487 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4