| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i3-13100F


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
b06f5
Core
Ice Lake-U
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Ice Lake
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
47.14k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
25.77k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
13.25k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
14.77k (x1.04)
TOTAL
74.82k
100.94k (x1.35)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
168.51k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
142.8k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
63.57k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
15.34k (x1.75)
TOTAL
214.34k
390.23k (x1.82)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4