| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i5-12500H


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
906a3
Core
Ice Lake-U
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
August 2019
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
225.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
22.61k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
17.73k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
9.63k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
8.4k (x0.59)
TOTAL
74.82k
58.37k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
85.49k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
94.93k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
39.15k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
6.08k (x0.69)
TOTAL
214.34k
225.65k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
5014 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4