Core i7-10610U vs i7-7820HQ
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-7820HQ is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i7-7820HQ gets 196.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-7820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906e9
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
25 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2020
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
55.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
196.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
23.23k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
20.13k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.57k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
7.92k (x0.89)
TOTAL
56.65k
55.85k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-10610U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
85.54k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
87.07k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
20.37k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.57k (x0.54)
TOTAL
162k
196.55k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
1901 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
1935 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
4368 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i7-7820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
5956 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1172 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
2030 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
14321 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4