| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs i5-5675R


Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
40671
Core
Comet Lake-U
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2020
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
194.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
21.91k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
18.59k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.2k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
5.72k (x0.64)
TOTAL
56.65k
51.43k (x0.91)

Multithread

i7-10610U

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
84.92k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
72.09k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
20.13k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
17.07k (x2.58)
TOTAL
162k
194.2k (x1.2)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4