| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs i3-9100T


Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906eb
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
25 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2020
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
192.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
24.89k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
21.82k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.83k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
8.63k (x0.96)
TOTAL
56.65k
60.16k (x1.06)

Multithread

i7-10610U

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
89.4k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
81.19k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
18.06k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
4.24k (x0.64)
TOTAL
162k
192.88k (x1.19)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4