| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs i3-4170


Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-4170 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i3-4170 gets 92.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10610U is 1.7 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
25 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2020
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
44.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
92.71k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
22.17k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
12.58k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.09k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
4.4k (x0.49)
TOTAL
56.65k
44.24k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-10610U

i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
47k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
31.06k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
11.96k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
2.68k (x0.41)
TOTAL
162k
92.71k (x0.57)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
222 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
1717 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i3-4170
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
5991 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
3401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
1189 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
11956 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4