Core i7-10610U vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 3.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 3.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
25 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
May 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
17.57k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
27.38k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
9.35k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
23.9k (x2.67)
TOTAL
56.65k
78.2k (x1.38)
Multithread
i7-10610U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
176.08k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
219.88k (x3.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
100k (x7.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
12.93k (x1.95)
TOTAL
162k
508.89k (x3.14)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4