Core i7-10610U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2020
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
14.2k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
23.23k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.35k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
5.18k (x0.58)
TOTAL
56.65k
47.96k (x0.85)
Multithread
i7-10610U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
58.24k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
105.72k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
28.73k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
5.59k (x0.84)
TOTAL
162k
198.27k (x1.22)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4