Core i7-10610U vs i7-1185G7
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
25 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
230.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
24.35k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
20.07k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
8.61k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
7.84k (x0.88)
TOTAL
56.65k
60.87k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-10610U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
93.58k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
94.71k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
33.28k (x2.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
9.34k (x1.41)
TOTAL
162k
230.91k (x1.43)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
8247 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4