| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs i5-10400F


Description
Both models i7-10510U and i5-10400F are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.9 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
4.3k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
16.56k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
5.25k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
12.61k (x0.89)
TOTAL
45.13k
38.72k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-10510U

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
18.1k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
79.16k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
26.75k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
13.81k (x1.72)
TOTAL
112.09k
137.82k (x1.23)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
26.28k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
23.38k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.52k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
12.96k (x1.27)
TOTAL
59.01k
68.14k (x1.15)

Multithread

i7-10510U

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
163.67k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
159.74k (x2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
39k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
7.56k (x1.13)
TOTAL
190.82k
369.97k (x1.94)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4