| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 7 4700U


Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4700U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 4700U gets 269.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 4700U is 1.4 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-U
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
49.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
269.56k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
10.38k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
22.63k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
8.52k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
7.99k (x0.78)
TOTAL
59.01k
49.53k (x0.84)

Multithread

i7-10510U

4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
86.74k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
128.69k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
48.71k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
5.41k (x0.81)
TOTAL
190.82k
269.56k (x1.41)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
5783 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
8579 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
3248 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
360 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
17970 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
4700U
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
2533 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5520 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
2078 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
1949 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
12080 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4