Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 5 5600
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600 is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 2.2 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 5600 gets 429.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600 is 2.2 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a20f12
Core
Comet Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2022
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
83.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
429.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
22.73k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
24.59k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
11.44k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
25.03k (x2.45)
TOTAL
59.01k
83.79k (x1.42)
Multithread
i7-10510U
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
134.28k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
178.56k (x2.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
78.16k (x4.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
38.26k (x5.72)
TOTAL
190.82k
429.25k (x2.25)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
2066 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
2747 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
589 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
5600
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
5166 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
2599 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
5688 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
19043 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4