| | | | | | |

Core i5-520M vs i5-520M


Description
Both models i5-520M and i5-520M are based on Westmere architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 26.3 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1.3 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
20655
20652
Core
Arrandale
Arrandale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 988
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2010
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.1k points
15.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.27k points
33.14k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-520M
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.41k
6.67k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
4.59k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.12k
2.49k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
2.18k (x1.16)
TOTAL
13.1k
15.93k (x1.22)

Multithread

i5-520M

i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.7k
13.75k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
7.91k
10.03k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.08k
6.67k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
2.68k (x1.04)
TOTAL
26.27k
33.14k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i5-520M
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
306 points/W
393 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
226 points/W
287 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
751 points/W
947 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-520M
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/GHz
1567 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
641 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
TOTAL
4466 points/GHz
5433 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4