Core i5-520M vs Celeron N3150
Description
The i5-520M is based on Westmere architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 26.3 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 26.3 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
406c3
Core
Arrandale
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 988
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
January 2010
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
13.1k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.27k points
31.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-520M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
5.41k
3.91k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
2.29k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.12k
1.57k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
1.44k (x0.77)
TOTAL
13.1k
9.21k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-520M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
10.7k
14.78k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
7.91k
8.62k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.08k
5.84k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
2.57k (x0.99)
TOTAL
26.27k
31.8k (x1.21)
Performance/W
i5-520M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
306 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
226 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
751 points/W
5300 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-520M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
641 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
4466 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4