Core i5-520M vs Athlon 64 X2 4200+
Description
The i5-520M is based on Westmere architecture while the 4200+ is based on K8.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 26.3 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1.5 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 26.3 k points while the 4200+ gets 17.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1.5 times faster than the 4200+. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
40fb2
Core
Arrandale
Brisbane
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 988
Socket AM2
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2010
January 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.1k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.27k points
17.83k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-520M
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
5.41k
2.88k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
3.69k
3.98k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.12k
2k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
0.72k (x0.38)
TOTAL
13.1k
9.57k (x0.73)
Multithread
i5-520M
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
10.7k
5.58k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
7.91k
7.67k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.08k
3.88k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
0.7k (x0.27)
TOTAL
26.27k
17.83k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i5-520M
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
306 points/W
86 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
226 points/W
118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
145 points/W
60 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
11 points/W
TOTAL
751 points/W
274 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-520M
4200+
Test#1 (Integers)
1844 points/GHz
1308 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1259 points/GHz
1807 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
723 points/GHz
911 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
641 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
4466 points/GHz
4352 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4