Core i5-520M vs Pentium E5200 (R0)
Description
The i5-520M is based on Westmere architecture while the E5200 (R0) is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 33.1 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1.3 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 33.1 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1.3 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20652
1067a
Core
Arrandale
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 988
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2010
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
15.93k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.14k points
24.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-520M
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
6.67k
2.87k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
4.59k
6.42k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.58k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
1.21k (x0.56)
TOTAL
15.93k
13.08k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-520M
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
5.74k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
10.03k
12.78k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
5.18k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
1.2k (x0.45)
TOTAL
33.14k
24.89k (x0.75)
Performance/W
i5-520M
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
393 points/W
88 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
287 points/W
197 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
191 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
947 points/W
383 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-520M
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2275 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1567 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
849 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
742 points/GHz
485 points/GHz
TOTAL
5433 points/GHz
5232 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4