| | | | | | |

Core i5-460 M vs Pentium Gold 5405U


Description
The i5-460 M is based on Westmere architecture while the 5405U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the 5405U gets 48.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 5405U is 1.4 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
20655
806eb
Core
Arrandale
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
PGA 988A
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2010
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.32k points
21.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.69k points
48.83k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-460 M
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.85k
7.01k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
4.64k
9.51k (x2.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
2.31k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.1k
2.52k (x1.2)
TOTAL
16.32k
21.34k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-460 M

5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.71k
16.03k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
10.68k
24.11k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
5.59k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
3.1k (x1.17)
TOTAL
33.69k
48.83k (x1.45)

Performance/W
i5-460 M
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
392 points/W
1069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
305 points/W
1607 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
190 points/W
372 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
207 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
3255 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-460 M
5405U
Test#1 (Integers)
2447 points/GHz
3046 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1658 points/GHz
4134 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1004 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
751 points/GHz
1094 points/GHz
TOTAL
5827 points/GHz
9278 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4