Core i5-460 M vs i5-1035G4
Description
The i5-460 M is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 87.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G4 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
706e5
Core
Arrandale
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
PGA 988A
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2010
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
16.32k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.69k points
142.69k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-460 M
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6.85k
7.07k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
4.64k
10.55k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
5.27k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.1k
5.66k (x2.69)
TOTAL
16.32k
28.56k (x1.75)
Multithread
i5-460 M
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.71k
25.28k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
10.68k
37.48k (x3.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
17.77k (x2.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
6.92k (x2.61)
TOTAL
33.69k
87.45k (x2.6)
Performance/W
i5-460 M
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
392 points/W
1685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
305 points/W
2499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
190 points/W
1185 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
461 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
5830 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-460 M
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2447 points/GHz
1910 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1658 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1424 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
751 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
5827 points/GHz
7718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4