Core i5-460 M vs Celeron J4105
Description
The i5-460 M is based on Westmere architecture while the J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the J4105 gets 61.5 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.8 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
706a1
Core
Arrandale
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
PGA 988A
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
16.32k points
18.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.69k points
61.49k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-460 M
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
6.85k
4.9k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
4.64k
7.26k (x1.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
2.75k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.1k
3.32k (x1.58)
TOTAL
16.32k
18.22k (x1.12)
Multithread
i5-460 M
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.71k
18.84k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
10.68k
27.45k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
10.35k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
4.85k (x1.83)
TOTAL
33.69k
61.49k (x1.83)
Performance/W
i5-460 M
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
392 points/W
1884 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
305 points/W
2745 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
190 points/W
1035 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
485 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
6149 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-460 M
J4105
Test#1 (Integers)
2447 points/GHz
1958 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1658 points/GHz
2902 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
751 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
5827 points/GHz
7289 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4