Core i5-460 M vs Celeron N3150
Description
The i5-460 M is based on Westmere architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-460 M is 1.1 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-460 M is 1.1 times faster than the N3150. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
406c3
Core
Arrandale
Braswell
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
PGA 988A
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
September 2010
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
16.32k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.69k points
31.8k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-460 M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
6.85k
3.91k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
4.64k
2.29k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
1.57k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.1k
1.44k (x0.68)
TOTAL
16.32k
9.21k (x0.56)
Multithread
i5-460 M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
13.71k
14.78k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
10.68k
8.62k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
5.84k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
2.57k (x0.97)
TOTAL
33.69k
31.8k (x0.94)
Performance/W
i5-460 M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
392 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
305 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
190 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
5300 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-460 M
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
2447 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1658 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
751 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
5827 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4