Core i5-460 M vs Celeron J1900
Description
The i5-460 M is based on Westmere architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-460 M is 1 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-460 M is 1 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
30679
Core
Arrandale
Bay Trail-D
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
PGA 988A
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
0 kB
Date
September 2010
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
16.32k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.69k points
33.25k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-460 M
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
6.85k
4.58k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
4.64k
2.32k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
1.72k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.1k
1.14k (x0.54)
TOTAL
16.32k
9.75k (x0.6)
Multithread
i5-460 M
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
13.71k
17.16k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
10.68k
8.42k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
6.22k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
1.44k (x0.55)
TOTAL
33.69k
33.25k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i5-460 M
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
392 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
305 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
190 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
3325 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-460 M
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
2447 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1658 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
751 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
5827 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4