Core i5-460 M vs Phenom II X6 1035T
Description
The i5-460 M is based on Westmere architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.4 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-460 M gets a score of 33.7 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 1035T is 2.4 times faster than the i5-460 M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20655
100fa0
Core
Arrandale
Thuban
Base frecuency
2.533 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
PGA 988A
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
6144 kB
Date
September 2010
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
16.32k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.69k points
80.19k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-460 M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.85k
5.17k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
4.64k
5.33k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.72k
2.76k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.1k
3.51k (x1.67)
TOTAL
16.32k
16.77k (x1.03)
Multithread
i5-460 M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.71k
29.82k (x2.18)
Test#2 (FP)
10.68k
30.79k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.65k
15.88k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.65k
3.69k (x1.39)
TOTAL
33.69k
80.19k (x2.38)
Performance/W
i5-460 M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
392 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
305 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
190 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
76 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
962 points/W
844 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-460 M
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
2447 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1658 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
971 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
751 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
5827 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4