| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs Xeon E5-2667 v3


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2667 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the E5-2667 v3 gets 343.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2667 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
95 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
41.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
343.64k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
13.1k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
11.91k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
4.83k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
3.83k (x0.29)
TOTAL
61.97k
33.68k (x0.54)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
105.42k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
109.99k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
44.56k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
17.7k (x2.16)
TOTAL
280.77k
277.66k (x0.99)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
20.99k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
11.9k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.72k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
3.75k (x0.27)
TOTAL
77.34k
41.36k (x0.53)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
172.62k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
110.03k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
44.06k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
16.93k (x2.05)
TOTAL
371.08k
343.64k (x0.93)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
1279 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
326 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
125 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
2545 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
E5-2667 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
5830 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
3305 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
11489 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4