| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i5-10500H


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 1 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
378.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4.98k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
17.92k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
5.81k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
12.55k (x0.91)
TOTAL
44.04k
41.26k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
29.53k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
118.16k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
38.43k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
5.29k (x0.64)
TOTAL
178.11k
191.41k (x1.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
15.89k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
22.74k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
6.09k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
12.49k (x0.92)
TOTAL
60.98k
57.21k (x0.94)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
96.8k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
149.1k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
39.68k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
5.28k (x0.64)
TOTAL
268.71k
290.85k (x1.08)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
15.86k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
24.07k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
5.94k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
11.82k (x0.89)
TOTAL
61.97k
57.69k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
97.37k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
154.42k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
38.76k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.4k (x0.66)
TOTAL
280.77k
295.96k (x1.05)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
27.93k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
25.41k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.91k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
12.85k (x0.93)
TOTAL
77.34k
72.1k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
176.41k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
158.8k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
38.53k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
5.25k (x0.64)
TOTAL
371.08k
378.99k (x1.02)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
2714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
2443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
5831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
6207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
16023 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4