| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
3.88k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
14.98k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
9.7k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
8.6k (x0.62)
TOTAL
44.04k
37.15k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
14.61k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
54.9k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
27.58k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
5.04k (x0.61)
TOTAL
178.11k
102.13k (x0.57)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
12.89k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
18.55k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
9.93k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
9.54k (x0.7)
TOTAL
60.98k
50.91k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
50.06k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
66.1k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
20.24k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
5.51k (x0.67)
TOTAL
268.71k
141.91k (x0.53)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
13.58k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
19.53k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
9.37k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
9.23k (x0.7)
TOTAL
61.97k
51.7k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
56.25k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
73.73k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
29.56k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.39k (x0.66)
TOTAL
280.77k
164.94k (x0.59)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
21.5k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
17.71k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
7.92k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
8.24k (x0.59)
TOTAL
77.34k
55.37k (x0.72)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
73.03k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
68.19k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
24.89k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
5.54k (x0.67)
TOTAL
371.08k
171.65k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4