| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i5-10300H


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.5 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
15.65k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
23.13k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
5.66k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
11.43k (x0.86)
TOTAL
61.97k
55.87k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
26.77k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
43.81k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
10.17k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
11.91k (x1.45)
TOTAL
280.77k
92.66k (x0.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
27.14k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
24.75k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.73k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
11.84k (x0.85)
TOTAL
77.34k
69.47k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
105.77k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
107.47k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
24.82k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
8.02k (x0.97)
TOTAL
371.08k
246.07k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4