| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i3-1005G1


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-1005G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i3-1005G1 gets 116.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 3.2 times faster than the i3-1005G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/6
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
50.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
116.63k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
3.07k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
13.76k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
8k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
6.59k (x0.48)
TOTAL
44.04k
31.42k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
8k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
35.53k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
18.53k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
4.3k (x0.52)
TOTAL
178.11k
66.36k (x0.37)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
10.52k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
17.6k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
8.76k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
6.55k (x0.48)
TOTAL
60.98k
43.44k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
26.86k (x0.29)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
42.38k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
20.65k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
4.21k (x0.51)
TOTAL
268.71k
94.1k (x0.35)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
11.93k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
16.99k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
6.43k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
4.59k (x0.35)
TOTAL
61.97k
39.93k (x0.64)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
29.07k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
46.14k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
19.47k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
4.18k (x0.51)
TOTAL
280.77k
98.86k (x0.35)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
19.45k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
16.75k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
8.04k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
6.38k (x0.46)
TOTAL
77.34k
50.62k (x0.65)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
46.52k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
48.76k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
17.12k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
4.23k (x0.51)
TOTAL
371.08k
116.63k (x0.31)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
3102 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
3251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
282 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
7776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i3-1005G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
5721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
4926 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2365 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
1877 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
14889 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4