Core i5-9600KF vs Ryzen 9 5900X
Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.3 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 2.3 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a20f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
12/24
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
January 2019
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
24.34k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
26.8k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
12.12k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
26.55k (x1.91)
TOTAL
77.34k
89.82k (x1.16)
Multithread
i5-9600KF
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
263.12k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
353.9k (x2.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
159.07k (x4.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
64.01k (x7.77)
TOTAL
371.08k
840.11k (x2.26)
Performance/W
i5-9600KF
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4