| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i5-13400


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
b06f2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Coffee Lake
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/6
10/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
47.01k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
26.73k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
14.28k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
12.1k (x0.87)
TOTAL
77.34k
100.11k (x1.29)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
228.2k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
160.28k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
71.12k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
38.23k (x4.64)
TOTAL
371.08k
497.83k (x1.34)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4