| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i7-1280P


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1280P is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i7-1280P gets 468.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1280P is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
906a3
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-P
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/6
14/20
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
91.45k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
468.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
6.94k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
18.46k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
11.27k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
13.6k (x0.98)
TOTAL
44.04k
50.27k (x1.14)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
44.01k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
125.05k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
76.28k (x2.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
15.52k (x1.87)
TOTAL
178.11k
260.85k (x1.46)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
22.72k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
23.88k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
12.75k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
13.71k (x1.01)
TOTAL
60.98k
73.05k (x1.2)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
151.95k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
160.95k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
84.9k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
15.91k (x1.93)
TOTAL
268.71k
413.72k (x1.54)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
22.76k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
25.2k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
12.64k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
13.33k (x1.01)
TOTAL
61.97k
73.92k (x1.19)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
149.83k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
170.43k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
83.32k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
15.67k (x1.91)
TOTAL
280.77k
419.25k (x1.49)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
39.78k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
26.06k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
12.44k (x1.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
13.17k (x0.95)
TOTAL
77.34k
91.45k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
209.96k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
170.21k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
72.04k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
16.09k (x1.95)
TOTAL
371.08k
468.3k (x1.26)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
7499 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
6079 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
2573 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
575 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
16725 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i7-1280P
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
8287 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5429 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2592 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
2744 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
19051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4