| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i5-1235U


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1235U is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-1235U gets 297.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1235U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
906a4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/6
10/12
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
1x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
81.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
297.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
7.33k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
18.27k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
12.8k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
13.2k (x0.96)
TOTAL
44.04k
51.61k (x1.17)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
29.24k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
83.32k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
54.53k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
4.99k (x0.6)
TOTAL
178.11k
172.07k (x0.97)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
23.53k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
23.51k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
14.71k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
13.24k (x0.97)
TOTAL
60.98k
74.99k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
106.07k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
115.88k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
60.53k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
5.88k (x0.72)
TOTAL
268.71k
288.36k (x1.07)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
23.03k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
24.11k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
13.9k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
12.11k (x0.91)
TOTAL
61.97k
73.15k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
111.78k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
124.18k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
59.87k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.76k (x0.7)
TOTAL
280.77k
301.58k (x1.07)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
36.73k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
22.09k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
11.24k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
11.58k (x0.83)
TOTAL
77.34k
81.64k (x1.06)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
130.18k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
110.21k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
50.76k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
6.31k (x0.77)
TOTAL
371.08k
297.46k (x0.8)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
8679 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
7348 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
3384 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
19831 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-1235U
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
8349 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2555 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
2631 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
18555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4