| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i3-12100T


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-12100T is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i3-12100T gets 330.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.1 times faster than the i3-12100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
90675
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
93.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
330.62k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
6.88k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
17.36k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
12.26k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
13.49k (x0.98)
TOTAL
44.04k
49.98k (x1.13)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
22.03k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
84.16k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
46.49k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
8.96k (x1.08)
TOTAL
178.11k
161.65k (x0.91)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
22.39k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
22.29k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
13.37k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
13.72k (x1.01)
TOTAL
60.98k
71.76k (x1.18)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
76.69k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
104.06k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
53.2k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
8.86k (x1.08)
TOTAL
268.71k
242.81k (x0.9)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
22.25k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
23.16k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
13.09k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
13.21k (x1)
TOTAL
61.97k
71.7k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
77.43k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
109.08k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
52.45k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.75k (x1.07)
TOTAL
280.77k
247.71k (x0.88)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
43.24k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
23.76k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
12.67k (x1.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
13.88k (x1)
TOTAL
77.34k
93.54k (x1.21)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
150.28k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
126.29k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
45.32k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
8.73k (x1.06)
TOTAL
371.08k
330.62k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
4294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
3608 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1295 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
249 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
9446 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i3-12100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
10546 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
3089 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
3384 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
22814 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4