| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i7-1195G7


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.5 times faster than the i7-1195G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
806c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4.57k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
17.21k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
9.97k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
14.98k (x1.08)
TOTAL
44.04k
46.75k (x1.06)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
12.75k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
45.98k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
27.86k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
20.06k (x2.42)
TOTAL
178.11k
106.66k (x0.6)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
30.89k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
25.57k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
10.64k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
15.66k (x1.13)
TOTAL
77.34k
82.77k (x1.07)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
96.34k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
95.75k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
32.29k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
15.2k (x1.84)
TOTAL
371.08k
239.58k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4