| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/6
12/24
TDP
95 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
30720 kB
Date
October 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.52k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
19.35k
8.68k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
2.83k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
3.13k (x0.23)
TOTAL
43.93k
18.17k (x0.41)

Multithread

i5-9600K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
26.24k
32.7k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
105.18k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.5k
35.18k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
9.54k (x1.18)
TOTAL
176.79k
182.59k (x1.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.91k
11.08k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
9.57k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
3.18k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.55k
3.28k (x0.24)
TOTAL
61.25k
27.11k (x0.44)

Multithread

i5-9600K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
95.21k
139.07k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
137.3k
133.47k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.05k
46.6k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
6.65k (x0.79)
TOTAL
276.96k
325.78k (x1.18)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
16.75k
11.18k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
25.5k
10.06k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
3.21k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.06k
3.12k (x0.24)
TOTAL
61.48k
27.57k (x0.45)

Multithread

i5-9600K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
96.03k
140.98k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
143.78k
145.37k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.06k
45.62k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
6.75k (x0.8)
TOTAL
283.33k
338.73k (x1.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
18.62k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
10.49k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
4.04k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
3.26k (x0.23)
TOTAL
77.75k
36.41k (x0.47)

Multithread

i5-9600K

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
236.25k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
151.05k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
58.9k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
6.7k (x0.84)
TOTAL
372.74k
452.9k (x1.22)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4