| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs i5-7300HQ


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-7300HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-7300HQ gets 168.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 2.2 times faster than the i5-7300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
906e9
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/4
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
53.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
168.81k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.41k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
19.35k
14.14k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
4.41k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
8.87k (x0.64)
TOTAL
43.93k
30.83k (x0.7)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
26.24k
12.75k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
52.88k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.5k
16.25k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
8.98k (x1.11)
TOTAL
176.79k
90.85k (x0.51)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
16.91k
11.71k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
16.74k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
4.27k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.55k
7.81k (x0.58)
TOTAL
61.25k
40.53k (x0.66)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
95.21k
44.38k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
137.3k
62.55k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.05k
15.6k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
7.85k (x0.93)
TOTAL
276.96k
130.38k (x0.47)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
16.75k
11.59k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
25.5k
17.89k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
4.14k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.06k
7.88k (x0.6)
TOTAL
61.48k
41.5k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
96.03k
44.42k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
143.78k
67.5k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.06k
14.6k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
8.06k (x0.95)
TOTAL
283.33k
134.58k (x0.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
21.65k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
19.18k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
4.38k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
8.3k (x0.59)
TOTAL
77.75k
53.51k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
77.12k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
68.68k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
15.24k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
7.78k (x0.97)
TOTAL
372.74k
168.81k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
1714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
1526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
3751 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
i5-7300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
6186 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
5480 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
2372 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
15289 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4