Core i5-9600K vs Ryzen 3 5300U
Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.9 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.9 times faster than the 5300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
860f81
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Lucienne
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
198.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
15.09k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
23.74k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
8.32k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
5.19k (x0.37)
TOTAL
77.75k
52.35k (x0.67)
Multithread
i5-9600K
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
67k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
89.94k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
36.84k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
4.6k (x0.58)
TOTAL
372.74k
198.38k (x0.53)
Performance/W
i5-9600K
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
13226 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4