| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs i7-12700


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-12700 is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-12700 gets 698.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700 is 1.9 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
90672
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/6
12/20
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
25600 kB
Date
October 2018
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
104.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
698.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
48.39k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
26.92k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
13.37k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
15.34k (x1.09)
TOTAL
77.75k
104.01k (x1.34)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
415.67k (x2.38)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
158.57k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
109.37k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
14.72k (x1.84)
TOTAL
372.74k
698.34k (x1.87)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
6395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
2440 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
1683 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
226 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
10744 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
i7-12700
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
9876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
5493 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
2728 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
3131 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
21227 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4