| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500 vs Xeon E5506


Description
The i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500 gets a score of 261.1 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 2.9 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
106a5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/6
4 /4
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
73.65k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
352.84k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9500
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
1.21k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
18.43k
2.75k (x0.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
1.94k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.63k
0.78k (x0.06)
TOTAL
41.34k
6.68k (x0.16)

Multithread

i5-9500

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
24.75k
12.25k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
103.1k
25.55k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.43k
17.1k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.56k
5.01k (x0.9)
TOTAL
165.85k
59.9k (x0.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
16.06k
4.48k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
23.19k
2.99k (x0.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.1k
1.81k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.79k
0.69k (x0.05)
TOTAL
58.14k
9.97k (x0.17)

Multithread

i5-9500

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
90.44k
41k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
131.23k
28.17k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
17.4k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.88k (x0.69)
TOTAL
261.11k
90.45k (x0.35)

Performance/W
i5-9500
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2019 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
521 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
4017 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3650 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5271 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1386 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2907 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
13214 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4