Core i5-9400F vs Ryzen 5 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9400F gets a score of 331.2 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1 times faster than the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
67.77k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
331.19k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9400F
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
27.15k
15.5k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.63k
22.96k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.38k
8.78k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.61k
8.5k (x0.73)
TOTAL
67.77k
55.74k (x0.82)
Multithread
i5-9400F
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
156.61k
110.78k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
138k
149.38k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
29.45k
60.88k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.14k
6.68k (x0.94)
TOTAL
331.19k
327.72k (x0.99)
Performance/W
i5-9400F
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
2409 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2123 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
453 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
110 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
5095 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9400F
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
6622 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5763 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1312 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2831 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
16528 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4