| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs Xeon W-2223


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the W-2223 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Glacier Falls
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8448 kB
Date
April 2019
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
25.09k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
20.76k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.07k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
8.76k (x0.88)
TOTAL
61.06k
59.68k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-9300H

W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
111.43k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
100.2k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
24.67k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
6.89k (x1.04)
TOTAL
187.98k
243.18k (x1.29)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
2027 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4