Core i5-9300H vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
306f2
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
45 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
452.9k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
18.62k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
10.49k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
4.04k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
3.26k (x0.33)
TOTAL
61.06k
36.41k (x0.6)
Multithread
i5-9300H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
236.25k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
151.05k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
58.9k (x3.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
6.7k (x1.01)
TOTAL
187.98k
452.9k (x2.41)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4