| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i9-10980XE


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.6 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cascade Lake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
45 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
25344 kB
Date
April 2019
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
1241.12k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
29.53k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
22.59k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.99k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
10.22k (x1.02)
TOTAL
61.06k
68.33k (x1.12)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
587.06k (x6.86)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
496.41k (x6.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
134.66k (x6.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
22.99k (x3.47)
TOTAL
187.98k
1241.12k (x6.6)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
7522 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4