| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i5-5675R


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-5675R is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i5-5675R gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-5675R is 1 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
40671
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Bradwell-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1364
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
June 2015
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
51.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
194.2k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
21.91k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
18.59k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.2k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
5.72k (x0.57)
TOTAL
61.06k
51.43k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
84.92k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
72.09k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
20.13k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
17.07k (x2.57)
TOTAL
187.98k
194.2k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
1306 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
1109 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
310 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
263 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
2988 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i5-5675R
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
6087 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
5164 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1445 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
1590 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
14286 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4