Core i5-9300H vs i5-10500T
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 1.6 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
302.13k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
25.16k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
22.28k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.18k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
11.97k (x1.2)
TOTAL
61.06k
64.6k (x1.06)
Multithread
i5-9300H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
144.86k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
120.98k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
32.55k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
3.73k (x0.56)
TOTAL
187.98k
302.13k (x1.61)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4