| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i3-6100


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.7 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
506e3
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
45 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
112.28k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
22.89k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
21.04k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
4.9k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
4.01k (x0.4)
TOTAL
61.06k
52.84k (x0.87)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
50.05k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
47.13k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
11.38k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
3.72k (x0.56)
TOTAL
187.98k
112.28k (x0.6)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4