Core i5-9300H vs i3-10110U
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.8 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
806ec
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
106.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
24.6k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
22.32k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.02k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
4.7k (x0.47)
TOTAL
61.06k
56.64k (x0.93)
Multithread
i5-9300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
47.98k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
44.28k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
10.33k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
3.98k (x0.6)
TOTAL
187.98k
106.58k (x0.57)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4