Core i5-9300H vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9300H is 1.1 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
810f81
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
168.69k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
14.48k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
23.84k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
5.43k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
5.46k (x0.55)
TOTAL
61.06k
49.21k (x0.81)
Multithread
i5-9300H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
54.39k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
88.77k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
20.04k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
5.48k (x0.83)
TOTAL
187.98k
168.69k (x0.9)
Performance/W
i5-9300H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
2595 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4