| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 188 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1165G7 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
61.06k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
187.98k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
24.7k
22.97k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
21.5k
21.61k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
8.99k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.99k
8.52k (x0.85)
TOTAL
61.06k
62.1k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-9300H

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
85.56k
82.75k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
76.43k
86.58k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.35k
29.34k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
11.72k (x1.77)
TOTAL
187.98k
210.4k (x1.12)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1901 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
430 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
147 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
4177 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6023 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5245 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2437 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
14893 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4