| | | | | | |

Core i5-9300H vs Xeon Silver 4208


Description
The i5-9300H is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9300H gets a score of 244.1 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.

Summarizing, the Silver 4208 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-9300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
50657
Core
Coffee Lake-H
Cascade Lake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1440
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.57k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
244.1k points
311.57k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9300H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3.38k
2.59k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
12.84k
9.5k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.6k
3.15k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.23k
5.9k (x0.95)
TOTAL
27.05k
21.13k (x0.78)

Multithread

i5-9300H

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
11.6k
21.09k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
48.01k
80.93k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
30.76k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
8.51k (x2.19)
TOTAL
80.54k
141.3k (x1.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9300H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
26.62k
16.86k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
12.08k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.52k
3.37k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.05k
6.29k (x0.52)
TOTAL
67.57k
38.61k (x0.57)

Multithread

i5-9300H

Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
107.95k
150.99k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
104.02k
118.54k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.4k
33.44k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.74k
8.6k (x1.11)
TOTAL
244.1k
311.57k (x1.28)

Performance/W
i5-9300H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2399 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2312 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
542 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
172 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
5424 points/W
3666 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9300H
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
6493 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5703 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1346 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2938 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16480 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4